Integrations of the Month
This month’s three integrations are not similar on the surface. Google SecOps is a SIEM, Abstract Security is a data pipeline platform and OpenCTI is where your CTI team probably already lives. However, customers running more than one of these integrations have mentioned the same problem to us. Nobody wants to bounce between five tabs trying to figure if a domain is worth the worry.
What these platforms do have in common is us. Silent Push integrates with all three, which means the same rich infrastructure context is available wherever your team happens to be working. Nobody has to jump to a different tool to get the fuller picture. Let’s dive into each integration below.
Google SecOps
Reputation and enrichment data, straight into your cloud SIEM
Google SecOps normalizes and correlates security telemetry at a scale most teams could not run themselves. What it needs from a partner like Silent Push is context on the domains and IPs that show up in that telemetry, delivered without analysts having to leave the platform.
The integration is available directly through the Google SecOps Marketplace. Once installed and configured with a Silent Push API key, a full set of Silent Push actions becomes available inside the Response IDE, the same place your team already builds and runs playbooks.
That includes reputation lookups for domains, IPs, ASNs, and nameservers, forward and reverse PADNS queries, domain density checks to flag suspicious nameserver clustering, certificate retrieval, and live URL scans that return content and risk data in real time. Enrichment data pulls in the full picture in one call, covering WHOIS, DNS history, and infrastructure associations.
For teams building out detection logic in SecOps, the practical value is speed. A suspicious domain surfaces in a case, an analyst runs a Silent Push action from inside the Response IDE, and the risk score and infrastructure context come back without a console switch. Teams can also simulate cases directly in Google SecOps to test actions before relying on them in production, which matters when you are validating a new detection path.
Full setup steps and the complete action list are available at help.silentpush.com.
Abstract Security
IOFA context applied before data ever reaches your SIEM
Abstract Security sits in a different place in the stack than the other two integrations this month. It is not a SIEM or a SOAR. It is a security data pipeline platform, built to collect, filter, enrich, and route telemetry before it hits a downstream destination like a SIEM or data lake.
That earlier position in the pipeline changes what an integration can do. Silent Push is available inside the Abstract Intelligence Gallery, Abstract’s marketplace of threat intelligence partners, alongside vendors like CrowdStrike and Google Mandiant. Once connected, IOFA data becomes part of the enrichment layer Abstract applies to telemetry as it streams through, rather than something bolted on after logs have already landed in an expensive SIEM.
For a team paying by ingest volume, this matters twice over. Abstract’s pipeline already reduces and normalizes data before it lands anywhere costly. Adding Silent Push context at that same stage means low-value or already-benign traffic can be filtered with more confidence, and infrastructure that Silent Push has flagged as pre-weaponized carries that context all the way through to whatever sits downstream, whether that is a next-gen SIEM, a data lake, or both.
It is a good fit for teams actively rethinking what goes into their SIEM in the first place, not just what happens once it is there.
OpenCTI
Structured, STIX-native threat intelligence for CTI analysts
OpenCTI is built specifically for CTI teams who need to centralize, visualize, and correlate threat intelligence using open standards, and the Silent Push integration is built to match that.
Data moves in two ways. Silent Push exposes TAXII endpoints so OpenCTI can pull in curated IOFA indicators, already mapped to STIX 2.1 objects, no manual translation required. Separately, the Silent Push Enrichment Connector, officially part of the OpenCTI ecosystem, monitors domains, IPs, and URLs already present in your instance and retrieves matching Silent Push enrichment on a scheduled or manual basis. Results come back as STIX 2.1 bundles, so they slot directly into OpenCTI’s existing data model.
Enrichment covers hosting infrastructure history, behavioral classification such as C2, phishing, or typosquatting, threat tags and reputation scoring, and any associated infrastructure or campaign patterns Silent Push has already mapped. Silent Push also supports RSS-based ingestion of threat reports, so narrative intelligence and APT attribution flow into OpenCTI alongside the structured indicators. An analyst gets the reasoning behind an indicator, not just the indicator itself.
Once ingested, all of it becomes part of OpenCTI’s native visualization layer: dashboards by source, type, and confidence, timeline views of infrastructure changes, and relationship graphs connecting indicators to campaigns. Deployment is straightforward through Docker or a manual setup, and the connector logs its own activity for teams that want visibility into what it is doing and when.
Read more about the integration on our blog.
That’s it for this month! If you want to see how any of these integrations would work in your own environment, our team will walk you through it.
What is the detection gap, and why does it matter for a pipeline or SIEM integration?
It’s the stretch of time between an adversary standing up infrastructure and your tools actually flagging it. Every integration in this post touches that gap differently. Google SecOps closes it at the detection layer, Abstract closes it earlier by enriching data before it’s even routed anywhere, and OpenCTI closes it by giving CTI teams the infrastructure context to get ahead of a campaign before it’s fully built out.
How are IOFAs different from IOCs?
An IOC tells you something bad already happened somewhere. An IOFA tells you infrastructure is being built right now, based on the registration, hosting, and configuration patterns that show up before a domain or IP is ever weaponized. That distinction is what makes all three of these integrations useful upstream of an incident, not just during the cleanup after one.
Why would I need a data pipeline platform and a SIEM?
A SIEM is where correlation, detection, and analyst workflows happen. A data pipeline platform sits in front of it, deciding what gets sent, filtered, enriched, or routed before it arrives. As data volumes and SIEM costs both climb, more teams are separating those two functions so they can control cost and improve data quality without changing how analysts actually work day to day.
Is the Silent Push OpenCTI connector open source?
The connector is officially part of the OpenCTI ecosystem and is built on OpenCTI’s open connector framework, using the same STIX 2.1 and TAXII 2.1 standards as every other OpenCTI integration. It runs in your own environment, whether deployed via Docker or set up manually.
Can I use these integrations alongside our existing Splunk, Tines, or ServiceNow setup?
Yes. Silent Push integrations are not exclusive to one platform. Many customers run more than one at a time, for example enriching data in Abstract Security’s pipeline before it reaches Splunk, or using both ServiceNow and OpenCTI so IR and CTI teams each get context inside the tool they already live in. The whole platform is API-first, so nothing here requires picking just one.
