Security teams do not adopt new tools lightly. Adding something to a stack that is already stretched means justifying the overhead, the learning curve, and the context-switching. I get that. It shapes every integration decision we make at Silent Push.

Before I get excited about any integration, I want to know what changes once we connect it. What does your team actually do differently? What decisions get faster? What gets blocked that would not have been blocked before?

This month, I want to walk through three integrations I am particularly excited about. Each one reflects a deliberate choice about where preemptive threat data needs to land to be useful, and how Indicators of Future Attack (IOFAs)™ fit into the stack you already have rather than sitting outside it.

---

Splunk SIEM & SOAR 

Preemptive signals, straight into your detection layer

Splunk is built to tell you what already happened. Logs come in, correlation rules fire, and an alert shows up. That loop is well understood. The problem is that it all starts after the fact.

So we feed IOFAs straight into Splunk as enrichment data, and your detection rules can fire on infrastructure that is being staged right now, before it reaches your environment.

When an adversary registers a domain and begins configuring it in patterns we recognize, that information lands in Splunk automatically. No manual lookups, no separate console to bounce between. Traffic Origin data also surfaces through the integration. If an IP shows as Irish but upstream traffic is coming from Iran, Splunk sees it. The alert reads “high-risk upstream origin,” not “connection from Ireland.” That changes the decision your team makes.

For teams that want to go even further, the Threat Check API plugs directly into your existing Splunk workflows. When a new domain or IP surfaces in logs, a single API call returns a scored, contextualized verdict backed by the full Context Graph, in milliseconds. It drops in cleanly without requiring a full integration build, which is useful if your team has custom pipelines or scripts already running as part of triage.

Available as a native Splunk app. Enrichment happens automatically on ingest with no additional analyst steps required. Full Threat Check documentation is at help.silentpush.com.

Check out our on-demand webinar below to learn more about powering your SIEM & SOAR with Silent Push data.

---

Tines

Build preemptive workflows without writing a single line of code

Tines is how a lot of modern security teams automate their work, and we built the integration around how they actually use it. We expose Silent Push’s enriched data from the Context Graph as Tines actions. Anything you can do in Silent Push, you can automate in Tines.

The most common pattern is enrichment on alert triage. When an alert comes in, Tines calls Silent Push automatically to assess the domain or IP involved. If the infrastructure is fingerprinted to a known threat actor, the case routes straight to a senior analyst. If it is low risk, it closes automatically. Either way, your analysts spend their time on the cases that actually need a person.

The more interesting use case is proactive blocking. When Silent Push identifies a new wave of pre-weaponized infrastructure matching a pattern your team cares about, a Tines workflow pushes it to your firewall or WAF automatically. The infrastructure is blocked before it is ever used against you. No ticket, no manual step, no window for it to slip through.

Teams building custom Tines stories also use the Threat Check API as a lightweight enrichment call at the start of any workflow, where speed matters and you want a verdict before routing. The lead time data speaks for itself: across our customer base, Threat Check shows an average of 154 days between when we identify infrastructure and when it appears in other feeds. The median is 117 days. For sophisticated threat actors, that number has exceeded 300 days. That is real time to act, not a rounding error.

Pre-built Tines story templates are available in our help documentation. A working enrichment workflow can be up and running in under an hour.

---

ServiceNow 

Context Graph intelligence inside your incident workflow

ServiceNow is where a lot of security work actually lives. Tickets, incidents, change management, etc. It is often the system of record for what a team worked on and why. The challenge is that by the time something becomes a ServiceNow ticket, the context around the threat has often been lost or buried elsewhere.

So when a ticket is created for a suspicious domain or IP, the Context Graph data attaches to it automatically. That starts with a risk score built from over 100 technical attributes across DNS, WHOIS, certificates, and web content. It also pulls in related adversary campaigns and known threat actor associations from our global dataset, any IOFA patterns we have published that match the infrastructure, and the connected infrastructure from the same campaign. IR teams get the full picture without pivoting to another tool.

The analyst working the ticket already has what they need, so the investigation moves faster.

Available through the ServiceNow Store. Configurable field mapping means it works with your existing incident schema. Learn more here.

---

---

If you want to see how any of these integrations would work in your own environment, our team will walk you through it.